The comment period is underway through Oct. 19, 2026!

Subscribe to receive updates and announcements.

Participate in the in-person and virtual public meetings!

View a virtual presentation to learn more about the project.

Project Overview Fact Sheet

This is an image of the cover of the Northwest Training and Testing Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement/Overseas Environmental Impact Statement project fact sheet booklet.

Notice of Availability/Notice of Public Meetings

This is an image of the Notice of Availability and Notice of Public Meetings for the Northwest Training and Testing Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement/Overseas Environmental Impact Statement.

Comments


The public, stakeholders, and federally recognized tribes are invited to review the Draft SEIS/OEIS and provide substantive comments on the Proposed Action, the environmental analysis, and the project’s potential to affect historic in-water properties in line with Section 106 of the NHPA.

The Navy and Coast Guard are accepting comments from Sept. 4 to Oct. 19, 2026. This review period allows time to review and comment on the 150-page document. Comments will be considered under NEPA and under Section 106 of the NHPA, as appropriate. Comments may be submitted at the in-person public meetings, using the online comment form, or by mail to:

Naval Facilities Engineering Systems Command Northwest
Attention: NWTT SEIS/OEIS Project Manager 
1101 Tautog Circle, Room 102
Silverdale, WA 98315-1101

Comments must be postmarked or received online by 11:59 p.m. PDT on Oct. 19, 2026, for consideration in the preparation of the Final SEIS/OEIS

 

Before You Comment!

“Substantive” comments, in the context of an environmental analysis, are comments on the analysis that contain practical importance, value, or effect. Submitting substantive comments on the SEIS/OEIS is a critical aspect of the public involvement process.

The most effective comments are those that provide useful information, such as:

  • Any scientific literature that should be considered in the analysis.
  • Something that should be clarified.
  • A substantially different alternative that meets the purpose and need statement and has not been considered.
  • An error in analysis that may affect the outcome.
  • New information that would change the analysis and conclusions.

Thank you for commenting!